|
TO:
Visitors via the Web to the Department of PS/CJ at ASU
FROM:
William Cassie, Kathy Simon and Dragan Stefanovic (chair) PS/CJ
Assessment Committee
DATE:
4/12/2000
SUBJECT:
Assessment
In the spring semester of 1999 the Department of Political Science
and Criminal Justice conducted an assessment of its undergraduate
and graduate students. Since the purpose of the assessment
was to capture the opinions of undergraduate political science
(PS) and criminal justice (CJ) majors and those of graduate students
in the Master of Arts (MA) in Political Science and Master of
Public Administration (MPA) programs, we purposely surveyed upper
division courses and those with high concentrations of PS and
CJ majors. To prevent repetition we also told students that
they did not have to take the survey if they had already taken
it in another class. For the same reason the surveys were not
anonymous but students were assured that their individual opinions
would be kept confidential. We surveyed 188 students.
HIGHLIGHTS
of the results of the survey are attached (Tables 1 and 2, which
were descriptive, are not shown)
Assessment Results
Table 3. Reason for Selecting Major.
Personal Desires/Interests
135 (98%)
Parents
14 (10%)
High School Teacher/Advisor
7 (5%)
Friend
21 (15%)
University Faculty/Advisor
23 (17%)
To Qualify for Another Degree 19 (14%)
Other
16 (12 %)
Note: These figures exceed the number of students
surveyed because students were encouraged to select more than
one answer.
Most people select one of our majors because it is of interest
to them. A valuable insight is that 17 percent (23) of the
students asserted that they chose their major because of the advice
that they were given by a University Advisor or Faculty member.
When asked about their plans after graduation
the students replied as shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Plan after Graduation.
Work
98 (71%)
Higher Education
78 (57%)
Although many of our graduates will immediately enter the job
force, many of our current undergraduate students will end up
earning a Master Degree in our Department. Please see our
list of options for graduate study here in our Department at ASU.
The next question asked students how
effective they thought their major was in preparing them for their
future endeavors. The results are shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Preparation for Future.
Strongly Agree Agree
Disagree/Strongly Disagree
PS
19 (31%)
33 (54%) 9 (15%)
CJ
27 (35%)
41 (53%) 9 (12%)
From these results, it appears that a large majority are satisfied
that their selection of a PS or CJ major has prepared them for
the future. This is of course, our major goal, to produce
citizens who can play an active and productive role in the political
world.
The next question inquired if the courses
the students had taken had aroused their interest in specific
areas of Public Affairs/Politics and Criminal Justice. The results
are shown in Table 6.
Table 6. Generated Interest.
PS Majors
CJ Majors
Public Affairs/Politics
Local
30 (49%) 31 (40%)
State
38 (62%) 51 (66%)
National
43 (71%) 48 (62%)
International
28 (46%) 13 (17%)
None
1 (2%) 14 (18%)
Criminal Justice
Law Enforcement, Courts,
Corrections etc.
Local
15 (25%) 39 (51%)
State
17 (28%) 57 (74%)
Federal
20 (33%) 54 (70%)
NOTE: The percentages in the table indicate the percentage of
majors who stated that their courses generated their interest
in a particular area. The numbers do not add up to 100 because
the respondents were encouraged to pick as many of the answers
as they wanted.
When asked if any of their courses should
be required to be taken earlier or later in the course work four
(7%) of the PS and five (7%) of the CJ students selected Yes.
There was no pattern in the responses. No courses were mentioned
more than once.
When asked if they felt that any of the classes that they took
outside of the department were unnecessary 17 (28%) PS and 29
(38%) CJ majors selected YES. The predominant response was
that statistics was unnecessary. Several students suggested
that statistics should be taught in the Department. Some
students also mentioned statistics as a problem in other parts
of the survey. Other courses that were mentioned less frequently
were history, art, biology, PE, and theater.
The next three questions asked students about role of internships.
The results of these questions are shown in Tables 7, 8 and 9.
Table 7. Role of Internships – Prepare Students
for Jobs
PS
CJ
Strongly Agree
38 (62%) 50 (65%)
Agree
23 (38%) 23 (30%)
Disagree
2 (3%)
Strongly Disagree
1 (1%)
Do Not Know
1 (1%)
Table 8. Role of Internships – Provide Practice
PS
CJ
Strongly Agree
28 (46%) 31 (40%)
Agree
29 (47%) 38 (49%)
Disagree
3 (5%) 3 (4%)
Strongly Disagree
1 (2%) 1 (1%)
Do Not Know
4 (5%)
Table 9. Role of Internships – Opportunity for a
Job
PS
CJ
Strongly Agree
11 (18%) 36 (40%)
Agree
29 (47%) 48 (49%)
Disagree
14 (23%) 8 (4%)
Strongly Disagree
7 (12%) 1 (1%)
Do Not Know
7 (5%)
It is clear from the results that the students feel that internships
play an important role in their education and finding a job.
Our internship program is one of the strongest assets of our Department.
The next four questions dealt with advising.
The first two dealt with the advising students received from the
Department Faculty and by the University Academic Advising.
The students were asked if advising met their needs. The
results for these questions are shown in Table 10 and Table 11.
The last two questions about advising asked the students if they
had received career advising from the Department Faculty and from
the University Career Center. The results for these questions
are shown in Table 12 and Table 13.
Table 10 – PS/CJ Advising Met My Needs
PS
CJ
Strongly Agree
18 (30%) 25 (33%)
Agree
36 (59%) 43 (56%)
Disagree
3 (5%) 5 (7%)
Strongly Disagree
1 (2%) 2 (3%)
Do Not Know
3 (5%) 2 (3%)
Table 11 – The University Academic Advising
Met My Needs
PS
CJ
Strongly Agree
15 (25%) 19 (25%)
Agree
27 (44%) 43 (56%)
Disagree
12 (20%) 12 (16%)
Strongly Disagree
1 ( 2%) 1 (1%)
Do Not Know
6 (10%) 2 (3%)
Table 12 – PS/CJ Career Advising
PS
CJ
Yes
52 (85%) 61 (79%)
No
9 (15%) 16 (21%)
Table 13 – University Career Center Advising
PS
CJ
Yes
10 (16%) 13 (17%)
No
50 (82%) 63 (82%)
Missing
1 (2%) 1 (1%)
If there are any weaknesses in advising it may be in the University
Career Center. The students either are not using the Center
or they are not getting what they need. It may be the former
since they are probably relying mostly on the advising they get
in the Department. In the future we need to change the way
we ask this question so that we can identify if there is a problem
with the Center.
The next three questions were designed to ascertain if students
felt that they had attained adequate writing, speaking and computer
skills. The results are depicted in Tables 14, 15 and 16.
Table 14 – Writing Skills
PS CJ
Strongly Agree
25 (41%) 23 (30%)
Agree
33 (54%) 47 (61%)
Disagree
1 (2%) 2 (3%)
Strongly Disagree
0 (0%) 2 (3%)
Do Not Know
2 (3%) 2 (3%)
Missing
1 (1%)
Table 15 – Speaking Skills
PS CJ
Strongly Agree
22 (36%) 19 (25%)
Agree
32 (53%) 48 (62%)
Disagree
4 (7%) 6 (8%)
Strongly Disagree
0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Do Not Know
3 (5%) 3 (4%)
Missing
1 (1%)
Table 16 – Computer Skills
PS CJ
Strongly Agree
9 (15%) 11 (14%)
Agree
35 (57%) 38 (49%)
Disagree
12 (20%) 19 (25%)
Strongly Disagree 0 (0%)
2 (3%)
Do Not Know
5 (8%) 6 (8%)
Missing
1 (1%)
Improving student computer skills seems to be the one area that
we can improve in since more than 24 percent of our students feel
that they have not attained adequate skills. We may in part
already be addressing this since we have just started offering
a class in Management Information Systems (MIS) and we have added
a lab component to our research methods class (PS 3115) making
it a four hour course.
The next question asked the students if they felt that the special
designator requirements were useful in insuring proper coverage
of important study areas. The results are shown in Table 17.
Table 17 – Special designators -- Important
PS CJ
Strongly Agree
12 (20%) 21 (27%)
Agree
31 (51%) 41 (53%)
Disagree
8 (13%) 5 (7%)
Strongly Disagree
2 (3%) 2 (3%)
Do Not Know
8 (13%) 7 (9%)
Missing
1 (1%)
The final two questions asked students what they liked and disliked
about the Department. An overwhelming number of students mentioned
the faculty, advising, accessibility and knowledge of the faculty
and the size of classes as the characteristic that they liked the
best about the Department.
When asked what they felt needed to be improved in the Department
the predominant answer was that we needed to increase the number
of courses and some mentioned that we should teach statistics
in our Department. No other trend was noticeable in the
responses.
Conclusions
Clearly we are doing well as a Department. Our majors were
complementary of the faculty and were generally satisfied with
the courses. Statistics is the only course that was repeatedly
mentioned as a problem. Students felt that they were getting
out of the courses what they needed. More than 85 percent
felt that their major was effective in preparing them for their
future endeavors. Our goal is to continue providing a quality
education to our students and to assure that they become active,
productive, politically engaged citizens upon graduation.
|